<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The ClickEquations Blog - Latest Comments in Bidding On Brand Terms</title><link>http://clickequations.disqus.com/</link><description>Paid Search Marketing and Analytics</description><atom:link href="https://clickequations.disqus.com/bidding_on_brand_terms/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:55:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bidding On Brand Terms</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/bidding-on-brand-terms/#comment-26764183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the additional reasons we always run a campaign with brand related terms is to track the amount of views on a brand. Do you see a steady increase of views? This could easily mean your brand is getting more known than before. the effectiveness of branding related marketing activities can also be measured over a long period of time this way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martijn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bidding On Brand Terms</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/bidding-on-brand-terms/#comment-7269206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Craig,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You've got some great point on brand name bidding - specifically your take on organic &amp;amp; paid conjoined. I actually work in a market where we're not allowed to bid on our clients brand names. What type of strategies would you suggest for this kind of marketplace?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks much!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bidding On Brand Terms</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/bidding-on-brand-terms/#comment-7252355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good stuff...do you think the same logic applies to queries you rank for organically?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hear the same counter-argument from clients (why would I PAY for something I'm getting for FREE) and really I think the test above is applicable. The logic should go "if I can increase the volume on a profitable term, why WOULD'NT I?" If I gave you a hundred dollars, then said that if you give me twenty of it back I'll give you another thirty, would you refuse because the first 100 was "free"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question, of course, is whether you're generating more overall volume rather than "poaching" natural clicks with your paid campaign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But yeah good stuff; really enjoy the blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tom&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Demers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bidding On Brand Terms</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/bidding-on-brand-terms/#comment-7188332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Anil - Good detailed post on the steps to do a brand/no-brand test.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig Danuloff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:28:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bidding On Brand Terms</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/bidding-on-brand-terms/#comment-7183446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I once did some work for one of the top brands in the world.  Yet, when most people searched for their brand they were met primarily with messages such as #&lt;a href="http://kills.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="kills.com"&gt;kills.com&lt;/a&gt;, dont buy#.com.  Their primary brand site was listed #4.  As many know, these hate sites had a much more powerfull crowdsourcing and linking power than this traditional rock of a company.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While my attempt at PPC for our product phrases was met with a thumbs down, it took one email and one PPT slide with the # of total times our brand was searched and what people were seeing.  I managed a 6 figure PPC spend the next week (only a fraction was spent on the brand terms).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The next day Google looked a little more in the brands favor.  No SEO tricks to send through development, no PR campaigns to gain link traffic, No politics surrounding which industries got which terms.   Win-Win.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great article!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bosilytics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bidding On Brand Terms</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/bidding-on-brand-terms/#comment-7174390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is my view that I posted about a year ago&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://webanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/should-you-be-paying-for-clicks-on-your_15.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/should-you-be-paying-for-clicks-on-your_15.html"&gt;http://webanalysis.blogspot...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anil</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>