<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The ClickEquations Blog - Latest Comments in Google Quality Score Video</title><link>http://clickequations.disqus.com/</link><description>Paid Search Marketing and Analytics</description><atom:link href="https://clickequations.disqus.com/google_quality_score_video/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:51:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Quality Score Video</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/#comment-7480728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been told explicitly by a Sr. Google Rep who works with this stuff, that Landing Page cannot help QS at all, it can only hurt - meaning if the landing page is spammy or has negative characteristics your QS drops. But otherwise the landing page has ZERO impact on Quality Score. I believe this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig Danuloff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Quality Score Video</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/#comment-7164358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you think the pie chart of Quality score is accurate?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    * 60% CTR (“user feedback”)&lt;br&gt;    * 30% Adwords Account Architecture  (“relevancy”)&lt;br&gt;    * 10% Landing Page Factors (that’s all? -WTF)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Landing Page Factors includes: relevancy of landing page, original, easy navigation, transparent ie. privacy policy page, load time, contact us page, little use of pop ups/unders….&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Relevancy of the landing page is only a small part of the landing page formula, did you catch that?  We don’t know exactly how much power this carries, but my guess is 30%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If that is true…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then landing page relevancy is really only:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;30% x 10% = 3% of the quality score?!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That can’t be, can it? Google prides itself on Relevancy so, how can this possibly be I ask you? I hope I’m wrong on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan PPCPROZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>